Bridges supported
20+ providers
Covers canonical, liquidity, and messaging bridges used in production.
Base • Canada
Bridge Aggregator for community leads scaling DAO operations
Plan and execute cross-chain transfers with aggregated routes, gas estimates, and risk scoring for major bridges. Operators who coordinate token communities, manage governance, and need reliable educational material for non-technical audiences. Safeguard community funds through structured approvals, real-time valuations, and playbooks for signer rotations. CSA guidance encourages registration while banks adopt crypto services cautiously.
- Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers.
- Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing.
- Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
- Need accessible explanations for complex on-chain data.
Key metrics
Route simulation time
< 2 seconds
Evaluate costs and SLAs before sending funds cross-chain.
Base profile
Coinbase-backed L2 with rapidly growing consumer apps.
Average swap costs $0.05–$0.10 thanks to aggressive fee rebates.
Unique insights
- Base: Average swap costs $0.05–$0.10 thanks to aggressive fee rebates. Pair this with bridge aggregator to daily portfolio valuations broken down by chain, strategy, and custody provider..
- Canada: Pre-registration undertakings (PRUs) require segregated accounting and quarterly attestations. Align community & dao managers workflows with higher governance participation and proposal quality..
- For community leads scaling DAO operations, emphasize Combines official bridge APIs with failover paths from aggregators such as LI.FI and Jumper. and track Compliance with treasury policy thresholds for diversification and liquidity. weekly.
Why teams rely on this tool
Core capabilities
Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers. Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing. Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
Audience fit
Need accessible explanations for complex on-chain data. Higher governance participation and proposal quality.
Base focus
Friend.tech, social apps, and compliant fintech integrations demand reliable analytics. Daily portfolio valuations broken down by chain, strategy, and custody provider.
Operational playbook
- 1Select source and destination chains plus desired asset.
- 2Review recommended routes, fees, and historical reliability signals.
- 3Execute the preferred route and monitor confirmation status in real time.
Use cases
Daily portfolio valuations broken down by chain, strategy, and custody provider. Teams must plan for bilingual English/French disclosure and real-time proof of reserves.
Approval hygiene checks before and after every multi-sig execution. Teams must plan for bilingual English/French disclosure and real-time proof of reserves.
Decoded transaction packets for governance recaps and community calls. Teams must plan for bilingual English/French disclosure and real-time proof of reserves.
Proof points
- Treasury teams evaluate safest paths before moving eight-figure balances.
- Market makers rebalance inventory with minimal downtime.
- Community managers publish recommended routes during ecosystem events.
ChainUnified tools that pair well
Related pages
Frequently asked questions
How do you score bridge risk?
We combine public incident databases, chain security advisories, and on-chain telemetry to weight each provider.
Can I enforce treasury policies?
Upload policy rules (allowed chains, minimum confirmations, spend limits) to block non-compliant routes.
Do you support multi-hop bridges?
Yes. Aggregated routes consider intermediary hops when they reduce cost or improve settlement time.