Bridges supported
20+ providers
Covers canonical, liquidity, and messaging bridges used in production.
Optimism • India
Bridge Aggregator for multi-strategy crypto funds
Plan and execute cross-chain transfers with aggregated routes, gas estimates, and risk scoring for major bridges. Professional investors running multi-chain strategies who require institution-grade reporting and risk controls. Safeguard community funds through structured approvals, real-time valuations, and playbooks for signer rotations. Developer density is high with an increasing number of local exchanges and gaming studios.
- Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers.
- Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing.
- Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
- Hard to consolidate portfolio exposure across chains and venues.
Key metrics
Route simulation time
< 2 seconds
Evaluate costs and SLAs before sending funds cross-chain.
Optimism profile
OP Stack ecosystem aligned with governance, public goods, and Coinbase transactors.
Transaction cost typically under $0.15 after Bedrock upgrade.
Unique insights
- Optimism: Transaction cost typically under $0.15 after Bedrock upgrade. Pair this with bridge aggregator to daily portfolio valuations broken down by chain, strategy, and custody provider..
- India: TDS rules on virtual digital assets require precise transaction logs and counterparty data. Align crypto hedge funds workflows with consolidated nav and pnl reporting across custody providers..
- For multi-strategy crypto funds, emphasize Combines official bridge APIs with failover paths from aggregators such as LI.FI and Jumper. and track Compliance with treasury policy thresholds for diversification and liquidity. weekly.
Why teams rely on this tool
Core capabilities
Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers. Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing. Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
Audience fit
Hard to consolidate portfolio exposure across chains and venues. Consolidated NAV and PnL reporting across custody providers.
Optimism focus
Velodrome, Base bridge, and retroactive funding flows dominate volumes. Daily portfolio valuations broken down by chain, strategy, and custody provider.
Operational playbook
- 1Select source and destination chains plus desired asset.
- 2Review recommended routes, fees, and historical reliability signals.
- 3Execute the preferred route and monitor confirmation status in real time.
Use cases
Daily portfolio valuations broken down by chain, strategy, and custody provider. Tooling must optimize for mobile devices and integrate with INR on-ramp analytics.
Approval hygiene checks before and after every multi-sig execution. Tooling must optimize for mobile devices and integrate with INR on-ramp analytics.
Decoded transaction packets for governance recaps and community calls. Tooling must optimize for mobile devices and integrate with INR on-ramp analytics.
Proof points
- Treasury teams evaluate safest paths before moving eight-figure balances.
- Market makers rebalance inventory with minimal downtime.
- Community managers publish recommended routes during ecosystem events.
ChainUnified tools that pair well
Related pages
Frequently asked questions
How do you score bridge risk?
We combine public incident databases, chain security advisories, and on-chain telemetry to weight each provider.
Can I enforce treasury policies?
Upload policy rules (allowed chains, minimum confirmations, spend limits) to block non-compliant routes.
Do you support multi-hop bridges?
Yes. Aggregated routes consider intermediary hops when they reduce cost or improve settlement time.