Bridges supported
20+ providers
Covers canonical, liquidity, and messaging bridges used in production.
zkSync Era • United States
Bridge Aggregator for multi-strategy crypto funds
Plan and execute cross-chain transfers with aggregated routes, gas estimates, and risk scoring for major bridges. Professional investors running multi-chain strategies who require institution-grade reporting and risk controls. Provide regulators and auditors with verifiable data on asset flows, ownership, and upgrade governance. US remains the largest source of institutional crypto volume and venture-backed launches.
- Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers.
- Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing.
- Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
- Hard to consolidate portfolio exposure across chains and venues.
Key metrics
Route simulation time
< 2 seconds
Evaluate costs and SLAs before sending funds cross-chain.
zkSync Era profile
Zero-knowledge rollup with rapidly evolving DeFi primitives.
Proof costs keep swaps between $0.10–$0.25 during typical network load.
Unique insights
- zkSync Era: Proof costs keep swaps between $0.10–$0.25 during typical network load. Pair this with bridge aggregator to continuous monitoring of allowance and upgrade activity with time-stamped notes..
- United States: FinCEN MSB registration, OFAC screening, and SEC/CFTC case law influence product decisions. Align crypto hedge funds workflows with consolidated nav and pnl reporting across custody providers..
- For multi-strategy crypto funds, emphasize Combines official bridge APIs with failover paths from aggregators such as LI.FI and Jumper. and track Completion of audit evidence requests without remediation findings. weekly.
Why teams rely on this tool
Core capabilities
Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers. Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing. Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
Audience fit
Hard to consolidate portfolio exposure across chains and venues. Consolidated NAV and PnL reporting across custody providers.
zkSync Era focus
Early-stage liquidity mining campaigns require aggressive monitoring for spoofed volume. Continuous monitoring of allowance and upgrade activity with time-stamped notes.
Operational playbook
- 1Select source and destination chains plus desired asset.
- 2Review recommended routes, fees, and historical reliability signals.
- 3Execute the preferred route and monitor confirmation status in real time.
Use cases
Continuous monitoring of allowance and upgrade activity with time-stamped notes. Teams must evidence internal controls and retain comprehensive activity logs for potential subpoenas.
Automated transaction decoding for SAR/STR preparation. Teams must evidence internal controls and retain comprehensive activity logs for potential subpoenas.
Cross-referencing CEX proof-of-reserve feeds with on-chain holdings. Teams must evidence internal controls and retain comprehensive activity logs for potential subpoenas.
Proof points
- Treasury teams evaluate safest paths before moving eight-figure balances.
- Market makers rebalance inventory with minimal downtime.
- Community managers publish recommended routes during ecosystem events.
ChainUnified tools that pair well
Related pages
Frequently asked questions
How do you score bridge risk?
We combine public incident databases, chain security advisories, and on-chain telemetry to weight each provider.
Can I enforce treasury policies?
Upload policy rules (allowed chains, minimum confirmations, spend limits) to block non-compliant routes.
Do you support multi-hop bridges?
Yes. Aggregated routes consider intermediary hops when they reduce cost or improve settlement time.