Bridges supported
20+ providers
Covers canonical, liquidity, and messaging bridges used in production.
zkSync Era • United States
Bridge Aggregator for regulated virtual asset compliance programs
Plan and execute cross-chain transfers with aggregated routes, gas estimates, and risk scoring for major bridges. Ensure crypto operations remain within AML, sanctions, and reporting requirements while enabling product innovation. Drive wallet activation, referrals, and retention with data-backed messaging and incentives. US remains the largest source of institutional crypto volume and venture-backed launches.
- Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers.
- Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing.
- Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
- Need granular provenance data for every wallet interaction.
Key metrics
Route simulation time
< 2 seconds
Evaluate costs and SLAs before sending funds cross-chain.
zkSync Era profile
Zero-knowledge rollup with rapidly evolving DeFi primitives.
Proof costs keep swaps between $0.10–$0.25 during typical network load.
Unique insights
- zkSync Era: Proof costs keep swaps between $0.10–$0.25 during typical network load. Pair this with bridge aggregator to audience segmentation based on wallet tenure, chain preference, and activity..
- United States: FinCEN MSB registration, OFAC screening, and SEC/CFTC case law influence product decisions. Align institutional compliance teams workflows with clean audit findings from regulators and big4 reviewers..
- For regulated virtual asset compliance programs, emphasize Combines official bridge APIs with failover paths from aggregators such as LI.FI and Jumper. and track Conversion rates from campaign wallets to active users. weekly.
Why teams rely on this tool
Core capabilities
Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers. Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing. Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
Audience fit
Need granular provenance data for every wallet interaction. Clean audit findings from regulators and Big4 reviewers.
zkSync Era focus
Early-stage liquidity mining campaigns require aggressive monitoring for spoofed volume. Audience segmentation based on wallet tenure, chain preference, and activity.
Operational playbook
- 1Select source and destination chains plus desired asset.
- 2Review recommended routes, fees, and historical reliability signals.
- 3Execute the preferred route and monitor confirmation status in real time.
Use cases
Audience segmentation based on wallet tenure, chain preference, and activity. Teams must evidence internal controls and retain comprehensive activity logs for potential subpoenas.
Localized education assets and dictionary entries for campaign landing pages. Teams must evidence internal controls and retain comprehensive activity logs for potential subpoenas.
Gas and liquidity monitoring around event windows to prevent friction. Teams must evidence internal controls and retain comprehensive activity logs for potential subpoenas.
Proof points
- Treasury teams evaluate safest paths before moving eight-figure balances.
- Market makers rebalance inventory with minimal downtime.
- Community managers publish recommended routes during ecosystem events.
ChainUnified tools that pair well
Related pages
Frequently asked questions
How do you score bridge risk?
We combine public incident databases, chain security advisories, and on-chain telemetry to weight each provider.
Can I enforce treasury policies?
Upload policy rules (allowed chains, minimum confirmations, spend limits) to block non-compliant routes.
Do you support multi-hop bridges?
Yes. Aggregated routes consider intermediary hops when they reduce cost or improve settlement time.