Bridges supported
20+ providers
Covers canonical, liquidity, and messaging bridges used in production.
Base • European Union & UK
Bridge Aggregator for institutional liquidity providers
Plan and execute cross-chain transfers with aggregated routes, gas estimates, and risk scoring for major bridges. Desks providing on/off-chain liquidity that must balance inventory, minimize risk, and report to counterparties. Provide regulators and auditors with verifiable data on asset flows, ownership, and upgrade governance. MiCA, ESMA guidance, and FCA rules define comprehensive disclosure and reserve requirements.
- Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers.
- Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing.
- Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
- Need precise transaction decoding and counterparty mapping across thousands of wallets.
Key metrics
Route simulation time
< 2 seconds
Evaluate costs and SLAs before sending funds cross-chain.
Base profile
Coinbase-backed L2 with rapidly growing consumer apps.
Average swap costs $0.05–$0.10 thanks to aggressive fee rebates.
Unique insights
- Base: Average swap costs $0.05–$0.10 thanks to aggressive fee rebates. Pair this with bridge aggregator to continuous monitoring of allowance and upgrade activity with time-stamped notes..
- European Union & UK: GDPR impacts analytics pipelines while MiCA introduces whitepaper and asset classification rules. Align market makers & liquidity desks workflows with tighter inventory hedging windows..
- For institutional liquidity providers, emphasize Combines official bridge APIs with failover paths from aggregators such as LI.FI and Jumper. and track Completion of audit evidence requests without remediation findings. weekly.
Why teams rely on this tool
Core capabilities
Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers. Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing. Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
Audience fit
Need precise transaction decoding and counterparty mapping across thousands of wallets. Tighter inventory hedging windows.
Base focus
Friend.tech, social apps, and compliant fintech integrations demand reliable analytics. Continuous monitoring of allowance and upgrade activity with time-stamped notes.
Operational playbook
- 1Select source and destination chains plus desired asset.
- 2Review recommended routes, fees, and historical reliability signals.
- 3Execute the preferred route and monitor confirmation status in real time.
Use cases
Continuous monitoring of allowance and upgrade activity with time-stamped notes. Expect multi-language communications, evidence of consumer protections, and sustainability reporting.
Automated transaction decoding for SAR/STR preparation. Expect multi-language communications, evidence of consumer protections, and sustainability reporting.
Cross-referencing CEX proof-of-reserve feeds with on-chain holdings. Expect multi-language communications, evidence of consumer protections, and sustainability reporting.
Proof points
- Treasury teams evaluate safest paths before moving eight-figure balances.
- Market makers rebalance inventory with minimal downtime.
- Community managers publish recommended routes during ecosystem events.
ChainUnified tools that pair well
Related pages
Frequently asked questions
How do you score bridge risk?
We combine public incident databases, chain security advisories, and on-chain telemetry to weight each provider.
Can I enforce treasury policies?
Upload policy rules (allowed chains, minimum confirmations, spend limits) to block non-compliant routes.
Do you support multi-hop bridges?
Yes. Aggregated routes consider intermediary hops when they reduce cost or improve settlement time.