Bridges supported
20+ providers
Covers canonical, liquidity, and messaging bridges used in production.
Ethereum Mainnet • United States
Bridge Aggregator for institutional liquidity providers
Plan and execute cross-chain transfers with aggregated routes, gas estimates, and risk scoring for major bridges. Desks providing on/off-chain liquidity that must balance inventory, minimize risk, and report to counterparties. Detect anomalies, suspicious approvals, and governance changes before funds are at risk. US remains the largest source of institutional crypto volume and venture-backed launches.
- Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers.
- Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing.
- Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
- Need precise transaction decoding and counterparty mapping across thousands of wallets.
Key metrics
Route simulation time
< 2 seconds
Evaluate costs and SLAs before sending funds cross-chain.
Ethereum Mainnet profile
Deepest liquidity and broadest institutional adoption.
Base fees typically 15–40 gwei outside of NFT drops; priority fees ~1–2 gwei.
Unique insights
- Ethereum Mainnet: Base fees typically 15–40 gwei outside of NFT drops; priority fees ~1–2 gwei. Pair this with bridge aggregator to live monitoring of contract upgrades, proxy changes, and admin key usage..
- United States: FinCEN MSB registration, OFAC screening, and SEC/CFTC case law influence product decisions. Align market makers & liquidity desks workflows with tighter inventory hedging windows..
- For institutional liquidity providers, emphasize Combines official bridge APIs with failover paths from aggregators such as LI.FI and Jumper. and track Mean time to detect high-risk contract events. weekly.
Why teams rely on this tool
Core capabilities
Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers. Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing. Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
Audience fit
Need precise transaction decoding and counterparty mapping across thousands of wallets. Tighter inventory hedging windows.
Ethereum Mainnet focus
Uniswap, Lido, EigenLayer, and Aave drive high-value flow and require precise gas timing. Live monitoring of contract upgrades, proxy changes, and admin key usage.
Operational playbook
- 1Select source and destination chains plus desired asset.
- 2Review recommended routes, fees, and historical reliability signals.
- 3Execute the preferred route and monitor confirmation status in real time.
Use cases
Live monitoring of contract upgrades, proxy changes, and admin key usage. Teams must evidence internal controls and retain comprehensive activity logs for potential subpoenas.
Token scanner sweeps of newly listed assets interacting with your treasury. Teams must evidence internal controls and retain comprehensive activity logs for potential subpoenas.
Mapping transacting wallets to known entities for counterparty risk scoring. Teams must evidence internal controls and retain comprehensive activity logs for potential subpoenas.
Proof points
- Treasury teams evaluate safest paths before moving eight-figure balances.
- Market makers rebalance inventory with minimal downtime.
- Community managers publish recommended routes during ecosystem events.
ChainUnified tools that pair well
Related pages
Frequently asked questions
How do you score bridge risk?
We combine public incident databases, chain security advisories, and on-chain telemetry to weight each provider.
Can I enforce treasury policies?
Upload policy rules (allowed chains, minimum confirmations, spend limits) to block non-compliant routes.
Do you support multi-hop bridges?
Yes. Aggregated routes consider intermediary hops when they reduce cost or improve settlement time.