Bridges supported
20+ providers
Covers canonical, liquidity, and messaging bridges used in production.
Polygon PoS • India
Bridge Aggregator for protocol security teams
Plan and execute cross-chain transfers with aggregated routes, gas estimates, and risk scoring for major bridges. Focus on smart contract security, counterparty risk, and operational safeguards for treasuries and protocols. Safeguard community funds through structured approvals, real-time valuations, and playbooks for signer rotations. Developer density is high with an increasing number of local exchanges and gaming studios.
- Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers.
- Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing.
- Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
- Proactively identifying malicious approvals and upgrade patterns is tedious.
Key metrics
Route simulation time
< 2 seconds
Evaluate costs and SLAs before sending funds cross-chain.
Polygon PoS profile
Enterprise and gaming friendly L2 with low-cost transactions.
Typical base fee below 60 gwei with sub-$0.05 execution costs.
Unique insights
- Polygon PoS: Typical base fee below 60 gwei with sub-$0.05 execution costs. Pair this with bridge aggregator to daily portfolio valuations broken down by chain, strategy, and custody provider..
- India: TDS rules on virtual digital assets require precise transaction logs and counterparty data. Align risk & security analysts workflows with fewer false positives in alerting systems..
- For protocol security teams, emphasize Combines official bridge APIs with failover paths from aggregators such as LI.FI and Jumper. and track Compliance with treasury policy thresholds for diversification and liquidity. weekly.
Why teams rely on this tool
Core capabilities
Compare bridge routes by cost, latency, and slippage across approved providers. Pre-compute gas requirements on source and destination chains before signing. Surface trust and risk annotations (custodial vs. canonical) to guide treasury decisions.
Audience fit
Proactively identifying malicious approvals and upgrade patterns is tedious. Fewer false positives in alerting systems.
Polygon PoS focus
Used by Nike, Starbucks, and major gaming studios for large user cohorts. Daily portfolio valuations broken down by chain, strategy, and custody provider.
Operational playbook
- 1Select source and destination chains plus desired asset.
- 2Review recommended routes, fees, and historical reliability signals.
- 3Execute the preferred route and monitor confirmation status in real time.
Use cases
Daily portfolio valuations broken down by chain, strategy, and custody provider. Tooling must optimize for mobile devices and integrate with INR on-ramp analytics.
Approval hygiene checks before and after every multi-sig execution. Tooling must optimize for mobile devices and integrate with INR on-ramp analytics.
Decoded transaction packets for governance recaps and community calls. Tooling must optimize for mobile devices and integrate with INR on-ramp analytics.
Proof points
- Treasury teams evaluate safest paths before moving eight-figure balances.
- Market makers rebalance inventory with minimal downtime.
- Community managers publish recommended routes during ecosystem events.
ChainUnified tools that pair well
Related pages
Frequently asked questions
How do you score bridge risk?
We combine public incident databases, chain security advisories, and on-chain telemetry to weight each provider.
Can I enforce treasury policies?
Upload policy rules (allowed chains, minimum confirmations, spend limits) to block non-compliant routes.
Do you support multi-hop bridges?
Yes. Aggregated routes consider intermediary hops when they reduce cost or improve settlement time.